[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fzMhyVhaGpcRMUUfrNf2eXSpqBavUY9V8aivmKJ7BK-A":3},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},200,"操作成功",{"id":7,"title":8,"content":9,"digest":10,"source":10,"coverPath":11,"thumbsCoverPath":12,"isTop":13,"isShow":14,"baseClick":13,"clickCount":15,"createTime":16,"typeId":17,"isNewest":18,"newsInfoTypeRespVo":19,"voiceUrl":22,"voiceSize":23,"taskId":24,"releaseTime":25,"titleEn":26,"contentEn":27,"voiceUrlEn":28,"taskIdEn":29,"voiceSizeEn":30},1559,"“全球最严AI新规”再次迭代教育边界","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">前不久，复旦大学教务处发布《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文（设计）中使用AI工具的规定（试行）》（以下简称《规定》），文件提出“六个禁止”，很快在网上引发关注，并被称为“全球最严AI新规”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">近两年，不少高校都出台了关于大学生使用AI（人工智能）工具的相关规定，而复旦大学的《规定》聚焦本科毕业论文（设计），细化了规则。中青报·中青网记者在采访中发现，一些高校的担心不无道理：不少大学生在学习、完成作业和论文的过程中使用AI工具，而且不当使用的行为比例不低。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">今年年初，南京农业大学公共管理学院讲师王思遥和浙江大学教育学院研究员黄亚婷对国内大学师生使用AI工具的情况进行了调研，调研对象包括13所高校的3000多名全日制本科生。调研结果显示，本科生使用生成式AI辅助学习的频率较高，其中“有时使用”“经常使用”和“总是使用”的占比分别为32.92%、40.49%和12.29%；有三到四成的本科生表示自己会直接复制AI生成的内容。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">既要AI赋能教育，又要避免AI影响大学生的创造力，高校究竟应该如何引导学生？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">高校科研院所对AI的使用边界在不断更新中\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">根据王思遥和黄亚婷的调研，本科生使用AI工具的形式很丰富，包括查资料、查文献、日常对话、分析数据，也包括润色语言、翻译和撰写论文；本科生通常会在完成课程小组作业、课程论文时用到AI。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">今年上半年，华北电力大学、湖北大学、福州大学、南京工业大学、天津科技大学、中国传媒大学等高校陆续发布通知，称将在本科毕业论文审核过程中，试行加入对文章使用生成式AI风险情况的检测。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">复旦大学前不久出台的《规定》更加细致，允许学生在文献检索、格式整理等非创新性方法的范围内使用AI，禁止在研究设计与数据分析、原始数据收集、结果图片与重要插图创作等过程中使用AI。而《规定》中引发争论的内容，比较多地集中在“禁止使用AI工具进行语言润色和翻译”这一点。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">今年9月，中国科学院科研道德委员会发布了《关于在科研活动中规范使用人工智能技术的诚信提醒》，要求院属各单位引导科技人员和学生透明、规范、负责任地使用人工智能技术。该文件提到，“在成果撰写时，可使用人工智能技术辅助整理已有的理论、材料与方法等，可进行语言润色、翻译、规范化检查”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">关于语言润色和翻译的规则，究竟应该怎么制定？\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">对此，上海一所985高校青年文科教师柴倩倩（化名）的态度比较宽容。她认为，AI并不能凭空产生内容，学生即使用AI来写作业和论文，也需要给出关键词和自己的核心观点，“AI只是起到了将原始想法丰富成文的工具性作用，没有什么坏处”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">有的教师则对写作能力十分看重。复旦大学艺术教育中心教授龚金平认为，在文科教育和学术研究中，学生过度依赖没有个性、缺乏深度的AI工具，可能会损害珍贵的表达能力。但他同时认为，用AI翻译论文摘要部分是可以的：“如果AI比人翻译得好，为什么不用呢？或者我们可以在AI翻译之后自己再改一改。不允许使用AI翻译，这样的规定也很难落地。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">AI翻译对语言类学生带来的冲击更大。上海外国语大学法语专业大四学生许婧怡告诉中青报·中青网记者，在完成作业和课程论文时，同学们通常不被允许使用AI翻译；况且考试是闭卷，如果平时依赖AI完成作业，就学不到东西，也通不过考试，得不偿失。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">许婧怡曾在法国学习、生活一年多，当过巴黎奥运会的志愿者，这些经历让她感受到AI工具的有限性：“人与人的交流需要深度的语言能力，比如在演讲、辩论的时候，必须激发自身潜能，扛着压力去表达，这种语言能力是无法靠AI去训练、获得的。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">对此，复旦大学教务处相关负责人解释，写作表达能力是本科毕业论文（设计）考察的重点内容之一，因此禁止使用AI工具进行文字润色、翻译是有必要的，否则就背离了考核学生的初衷，“我们希望学生将AI作为一种工具，助力、赋能而不是取代人，因此试图去明确边界。这个规定不可能一步到位，会随着时代变迁不断快速迭代”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">如何让学生负责任地使用生成式AI工具\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“它能根据我的要求不断调整输出内容，有时候能意外激发我的写作灵感。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“回过去看之前的对话记录，然后对比现在和之前的思维，确实不一样……没有最优，只有更优，变得更加大胆，敢于质疑了，质疑自己，也质疑别人。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“只要复制粘贴或者稍微调整下格式表达，太方便了，课程论文、思想报告，我基本交给AI了。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“既然能不费吹灰之力完成任务，又何必大费周章去查资料、整理资料，然后还绞尽脑汁去思考呢？”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在王思遥参与的调研中，就AI工具与创造力的话题，接受访谈的学生给出了正反两面的回答。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">王思遥分析，导致这种现象的原因大概可以归纳为两类，一是无意识的不当使用，二是“明知不可为而为之”的主动抄袭。在第一种情况中，学生不知道怎样使用AI是恰当的，他们对于使用“度”的理解比较模糊，并不是故意抄袭。她认为，这类情况主要是当前缺乏统一、规范的生成式AI在教育领域的应用性法规、政策文件所导致的。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">多名受访教师也都提到，由于技术的限制，目前还没有很好的检测AI使用工具，这给评价学生作业、论文带来挑战。因此，由高校、教师给出明确的态度和规则十分必要。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">香港大学对AI工具的态度从“禁止”转向“拥抱”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">2023年年初，香港大学发布通知，禁止学生使用ChatGPT等AI工具完成课程作业、评估等，学生如果在没有取得教师书面许可的情况下使用，会被当作抄袭个案处理。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">当年8月，香港大学又宣布，新学年会免费为师生提供多种生成式AI应用程序，学生每个月可向AI提出最多20个指令。对此，香港大学官网发布的新闻稿解释：生成式AI正在快速普及发展；学生具备有效掌握和应用生成式AI工具的能力很重要，这是除口语、写作、视频、数码4种重要的沟通传播能力以外，学生须具备的第五种重要能力。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">这篇新闻稿同时指出：在新政策下，教师要引导学生善用生成式AI以达到最佳的学习成果，在教学中培养学生的分析性思维、批判性研究能力；教师应制定公平有效的课程评价机制，在秉持最高标准的学术诚信原则下，确保学生负责任地使用生成式AI工具。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">用AI检测AI也不是万能的。香港大学官方网站上另一篇文章《生成式AI与抄袭》则提到，过去大家广泛使用的检测抄袭工具Turnitin，在用于AI相似性检查时会产生误报，因此，教师要充分意识到检测工具的局限性，检测结果只能作为参考。教师可以与学生交谈，要求学生解释完成作业的过程，例如让学生提交作业的草稿；而学生应该意识到学术诚信的重要性，并准备好与教师交流。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">复旦大学也有类似的要求。复旦大学的《规定》明确规定，禁止使用任何AI工具对本科毕业论文（设计）进行评审。同时，要求学生在毕业论文（设计）中给出学术诚信方面的承诺，并对指导教师、答辩委员和评审专家提出了要求：教师要在和学生的交流过程中，确保学生完成论文（设计）的原创性、创新性和独立自主完成的情况。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“顺应时势”发挥AI在教育中的优势\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">AI对大学生创造力的影响，是“双刃剑”式的。不少高校已经就培养大学生AI素养，推出了系列举措。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">例如，复旦大学今年6月宣布，在2024-2025学年推出至少100门“AI大课”；今年9月，南京大学面向全体本科生开设“人工智能通识核心课程体系”；浙江大学从今年秋冬学期开始，将人工智能课定为本科生通识必修课，理、工、农、医、人文、社科、艺术等不同专业背景的学生可以根据各自基础和需要，选择ABC三类课程。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在关于AI与育人的探讨中，教育界专家一再强调教师的重要性。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">例如，今年9月，北京大学教育学院学习科学实验室执行主任尚俊杰等人在媒体发表文章，认为未来的教师在生成式AI的协助下将成为“超级教师”，更加注重育人，并兼有监督机器教学的职责。文章提出：有必要对教师开展系统的产品使用培训，以确保教师能够充分发挥其主观能动性，促进生成式AI与教育的有效融合。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在生成式AI应用推广的浪潮中，人们担心部分传统行业会被AI取代，新闻传播首当其冲。中青报·中青网记者发现，一些高校教师正在主动学习AI知识，更新教学方法和内容，指导学生善用AI、提升创造力，而不是被AI取代。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">目前，复旦大学新闻学院青年副研究员蓝星宇正在给专硕班的学生上智能传播课程，讲解新的技术现象。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">蓝星宇鼓励学生用AI创作作品，希望学生用各种不同的AI工具产出有创意的作品，比如用AI打造自己的工作流，生成一个MV（音乐短片）。“我的目的是引导学生更好地使用AI工具。”这名年轻教师说。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">无独有偶。同济大学艺术与传媒学院副教授陈青文在新媒体素养课程中，引入了AI素养的内容。她还在和几名年轻教师合作，建设一门名为“AI素养”的传播学专业课。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“AI时代的传播对社会影响是很大的，比如假新闻、社交机器人、网络舆论与内容操控等，这些新现象与问题，学生都要去了解、辨识和应对。”陈青文说。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">为了提高教师教学与创新能力，同济大学开设了“人工智能科学与技术”课程系列研讨会。虽然不太懂一些人工智能系统模型，但陈青文听会后很受启发。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">她在自己的课上引导学生拓展获取信息来源的渠道，形成自己的知识结构，培养多方面的技能以及运用AI的能力，“不是凡事交给AI，最终被AI取代”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在王思遥看来，技术变革和教育创新自古以来都是相互依存、相互促进的关系。她说：“在AI技术快速发展的当下，我们不可能‘逆势而为’，而是要思考如何在‘顺应时势’的过程中发挥AI在教育中的优势，尽可能规避负面影响。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">有了这样的基本认知后，王思遥认为，高校相关政策文件的主旨应该也会比较清晰：“问题不在于学生是不是使用AI，而是如何科学、合理、有效地使用AI，尤其是如何规避高科技引发的学术不端行为。”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\">【新闻来源】央视网 \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fnews.cctv.com\u002F2024\u002F12\u002F30\u002FARTISzRK22P6rdOuZwfUVz2t241230.shtml\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\"> https:\u002F\u002Fwww.msn.cn\u002Fzh-cn\u002Fnews\u002Fother\u002Far-AA1RTDQy?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=6936317f054647a2afcd53fafcde084a&ei\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\">（本网转发此文章，旨在为读者提供更多的信息资讯，所涉内容不构成投资、消费建议。文章事实如有疑问，请与有关方核实，文章观点非本网观点，仅供读者参考。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","","https:\u002F\u002Fimage.51xinwei.com\u002F2026\u002F01\u002F2e280fd90ea94ad490ca9b4698516eab\u002F教育生态.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fimage.51xinwei.com\u002F2026\u002F01\u002Fthumbs\u002F2e280fd90ea94ad490ca9b4698516eab\u002F教育生态.jpg",0,1,71,"2026-01-04 08:55",2,false,{"id":17,"name":20,"enName":21},"芯位视野","Xinwei Vision","https:\u002F\u002Fxinwei-dev-test.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs.com\u002Fintelligent\u002Faudio%3Ae92eb02b-ccba-444b-8aef-602617beddd1%3A0.wav?Expires=1767494505&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tNvY2RkKjZw4LLWsrPK&Signature=q%2FAdlDW7lnhqg1Sn%2BzJikhFBeUw%3D",20386996,"e92eb02b-ccba-444b-8aef-602617beddd1","2026-01-04 08:52","\"The World's Strictest AI Regulation\" Again Re-defines the Boundaries of Education","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">Not long ago, the Academic Affairs Office of Fudan University released \"Fudan University Regulations on the Use of AI Tools in Undergraduate Thesis (Design)\" (Trial) (hereinafter referred to as the \"Regulations\"). The document proposed six prohibitions, which quickly attracted online attention and was called \"the world's strictest AI regulation.\"\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In recent years, many universities have issued relevant regulations regarding the use of AI (artificial intelligence) tools by college students. However, Fudan University's \"Regulations\" focus on undergraduate thesis (design), and detail the rules. According to a reporter from China Youth Daily·China Youth Network, some universities' concerns are not without reason: many college students use AI tools in learning, completing assignments, and writing papers, and the proportion of improper use is quite high.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">At the beginning of this year, Wang Siyao, a lecturer at the School of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, and Huang Yating, a researcher at the School of Education, Zhejiang University, conducted a survey on the use of AI tools by university teachers and students in China. The survey subjects included more than 3,000 full-time undergraduate students from 13 universities. The survey results showed that undergraduates frequently used generative AI to assist their studies, with the proportions of \"sometimes using,\" \"often using,\" and \"always using\" being 32.92%, 40.49%, and 12.29%, respectively; three to four out of ten undergraduates said they directly copied content generated by AI.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">On one hand, AI empowers education, but on the other hand, it should avoid affecting the creativity of college students. How should universities guide students?\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">The boundaries for the use of AI in universities and research institutions are constantly being updated\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">According to Wang Siyao and Huang Yating's survey, undergraduates use AI tools in various forms, including searching for information, literature, daily conversations, data analysis, as well as polishing language, translation, and writing papers; undergraduates usually use AI when completing group assignments or course papers.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">This year, universities such as North China Electric Power University, Hubei University, Fujian University, Nanjing Tech University, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, and Communication University of China have successively issued notices stating that they will trial adding checks for the risk of using generative AI in the review process of undergraduate theses.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Fudan University's recently issued \"Regulations\" are more detailed, allowing students to use AI within non-innovative methods such as literature retrieval and formatting, but prohibiting the use of AI in research design and data analysis, original data collection, creation of result images and important illustrations. The content of the \"Regulations\" that has sparked controversy mainly focuses on \"prohibiting the use of AI tools for language polishing and translation.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In September this year, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Ethics Committee for Scientific Research issued \"A Reminder on the Integrity of Using Artificial Intelligence Technology in Scientific Research Activities,\" requiring affiliated units to guide scientific and technical personnel and students to use artificial intelligence technology transparently, standardly, and responsibly. The document mentions that \"when writing achievements, AI technology can be used to assist in organizing existing theories, materials, and methods, and can perform language polishing, translation, and standardized checks.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">How should the rules for language polishing and translation be formulated?\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">For this issue, a young teacher in the humanities at a 985 university in Shanghai, Chai Qianqian (a pseudonym), takes a relatively lenient attitude. She believes that AI cannot create content out of nowhere, and even if students use AI to write assignments and papers, they need to provide keywords and their own core ideas. \"AI only plays an instrumental role in enriching original ideas into text, and there is no harm in that.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Some teachers place great emphasis on writing skills. Professor Gong Jinping of the Art Education Center at Fudan University believes that over-reliance on AI tools lacking individuality and depth in liberal arts education and academic research may damage precious expression abilities. However, he also thinks that using AI for translating paper abstracts is acceptable: \"If AI translates better than people, why not use it? Or we can revise it ourselves after AI translation. It's hard to implement a regulation that prohibits using AI for translation.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">AI translation has a greater impact on language students. Xu Jingyi, a senior student majoring in French at Shanghai International Studies University, told the reporter from China Youth Daily·China Youth Network that students are generally not allowed to use AI translation when completing assignments and course papers; moreover, exams are closed-book, and if students rely on AI to complete assignments, they won't learn anything and won't pass the exams, which would be counterproductive.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Xu Jingyi studied and lived in France for more than a year and worked as a volunteer for the Paris Olympics. These experiences made her feel the limitations of AI tools: \"Human communication requires deep language skills, such as in speeches and debates, where one must tap into personal potential and express under pressure. This kind of language ability cannot be trained or obtained through AI.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In response, a relevant official from Fudan University's Academic Affairs Office explained that writing and expression abilities are one of the key contents examined in undergraduate theses (design). Therefore, it is necessary to prohibit the use of AI tools for text polishing and translation, otherwise it would deviate from the purpose of assessing students. \"We hope students regard AI as a tool to support and empower rather than replace humans. Therefore, we try to clarify the boundaries. This regulation cannot be perfected in one step, and will continue to evolve rapidly with the changing times.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">How to Enable Students to Use Generative AI Tools Responsibly\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“It can continuously adjust its output according to my requirements, and sometimes it unexpectedly inspires my writing inspiration.”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“Looking back at previous conversation records and comparing the current and previous thinking, it is indeed different... There is no best, only better, becoming bolder, daring to question, questioning myself and others.”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“As long as I copy-paste or slightly adjust the format expression, it's too convenient. For course papers and ideological reports, I basically hand them over to AI.”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“Why go to so much trouble to look up and organize materials, and then think hard, when I can easily complete the task?”\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In Wang Siyao's survey, students who participated in the interview gave both positive and negative responses regarding the relationship between AI tools and creativity.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Wang Siyao analyzed that the reasons behind this phenomenon can probably be summarized into two categories: one is unconscious improper use, and the other is \"knowing it's wrong but doing it anyway\" active plagiarism. In the first case, students don't know how to use AI properly, and their understanding of the \"degree\" of use is quite vague, not intentional plagiarism. She believes that this situation is mainly caused by the lack of unified and standardized application regulations and policy documents for generative AI in the education field currently.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Many interviewed teachers also mentioned that due to technological limitations, there are currently no good tools to detect AI usage, which poses challenges in evaluating students' assignments and papers. Therefore, it is essential for universities and teachers to give clear attitudes and rules.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">The University of Hong Kong has shifted its attitude towards AI tools from \"prohibition\" to \"embracing.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In early 2023, the University of Hong Kong issued a notice prohibiting students from using AI tools like ChatGPT to complete coursework and assessments. Students who use these tools without written permission from their teachers will be treated as cases of plagiarism.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In August of the same year, the University of Hong Kong announced that starting next academic year, it would provide free access to various generative AI applications for faculty and students. Students can submit up to 20 instructions to AI each month. According to a news article published on the University of Hong Kong's official website, generative AI is rapidly becoming popular; it is important for students to effectively master and apply generative AI tools. This is the fifth important skill students must possess, in addition to oral, writing, video, and digital communication skills.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">The article also pointed out that under the new policy, teachers should guide students to make the best use of generative AI to achieve optimal learning outcomes, cultivating students' analytical thinking and critical research abilities in teaching. Teachers should establish fair and effective course evaluation mechanisms, ensuring that students use generative AI tools responsibly while upholding the highest standards of academic integrity.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Detecting AI with AI is not a universal solution. Another article on the University of Hong Kong's official website titled \"Generative AI and Plagiarism\" mentions that traditional plagiarism detection tools like Turnitin often produce false positives when used for checking AI similarity. Therefore, teachers should fully recognize the limitations of detection tools, and the detection results can only serve as references. Teachers can talk to students, ask them to explain the process of completing assignments, such as requiring students to submit draft versions of their assignments; students should realize the importance of academic integrity and be prepared to communicate with teachers.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Fudan University also has similar requirements. The \"Regulations\" of Fudan University clearly stipulate that any AI tool is prohibited from reviewing undergraduate theses (design). At the same time, it requires students to make commitments regarding academic integrity in their theses (design) and imposes requirements on advisors, examiners, and evaluators: teachers should ensure the originality, innovation, and independent completion of students' theses (design) during their communication with students.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">\"Adapting to the Times\" Leverage the Advantages of AI in Education\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">The impact of AI on the creativity of college students is a double-edged sword. Many universities have already launched a series of measures to cultivate students' AI literacy.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">For example, Fudan University announced in June this year that it will offer at least 100 \"AI big classes\" in the 2024-2025 academic year; in September this year, Nanjing University launched a \"General Core Course System on Artificial Intelligence\" for all undergraduates; Zhejiang University has made artificial intelligence courses a required general education course for undergraduates starting from this autumn and winter semester. Students from different professional backgrounds such as science, engineering, agriculture, medicine, humanities, social sciences, and art can choose ABC-level courses based on their own foundations and needs.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In discussions about AI and education, educational experts repeatedly emphasize the importance of teachers.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">For instance, in September this year, Shang Junjie, executive director of the Learning Science Laboratory at the School of Education, Peking University, and others published an article in the media, stating that future teachers, aided by generative AI, will become \"super teachers,\" focusing more on nurturing and taking on the responsibility of supervising machine teaching. The article proposed that it is necessary to conduct systematic training for teachers to ensure that they can fully utilize their initiative and promote the effective integration of generative AI and education.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In the wave of promoting the application of generative AI, people are worried that some traditional industries may be replaced by AI, and journalism is among the first to be affected. The reporter from China Youth Daily·China Youth Network found that some university teachers are actively learning AI knowledge, updating their teaching methods and content, guiding students to use AI wisely and enhance their creativity, rather than being replaced by AI.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Currently, Lan Xingyu, a young associate researcher at the School of Journalism, Fudan University, is teaching an intelligent communication course to students in the professional master's program, explaining new technological phenomena.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Lan Xingyu encourages students to create works using AI, hoping that students will produce creative works using various different AI tools, such as creating their own workflow with AI and generating a music video (MV). \"My goal is to guide students to better use AI tools,\" said this young teacher.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Similarly, Associate Professor Chen Qingwen from the School of Arts and Media at Tongji University introduced AI literacy content in her new media literacy course. She is also collaborating with several young teachers to develop a specialized course on \"AI Literacy\" in communication studies.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">\"The impact of AI-era communication on society is significant, such as fake news, social robots, online public opinion, and content manipulation. These new phenomena and issues must be understood, identified, and addressed by students,\" said Chen Qingwen.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">To improve teachers' teaching and innovation capabilities, Tongji University has launched a series of seminars on \"Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology.\" Although she doesn't understand some AI system models, Chen Qingwen felt inspired after attending the seminars.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">She guides her students to expand the channels for obtaining information, form their own knowledge structure, and develop multi-faceted skills and the ability to use AI, \"not handing everything over to AI and ultimately being replaced by AI.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In Wang Siyao's view, the relationship between technological change and educational innovation has always been interdependent and mutually reinforcing. She said, \"In the context of rapid development of AI technology, we cannot 'go against the trend,' but instead should consider how to leverage the advantages of AI in education while minimizing negative impacts during the process of 'adapting to the times.'\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">After gaining this basic understanding, Wang Siyao believes that the main purpose of the policies and documents of universities should also be clear: \"The problem is not whether students use AI, but how to use AI scientifically, reasonably, and effectively, especially how to prevent academic misconduct caused by high technology.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\">【News Source】 CCTV.com \u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fnews.cctv.com\u002F2024\u002F12\u002F30\u002FARTISzRK22P6rdOuZwfUVz2t241230.shtml\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\"> https:\u002F\u002Fwww.msn.cn\u002Fzh-cn\u002Fnews\u002Fother\u002Far-AA1RTDQy?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=6936317f054647a2afcd53fafcde084a&ei\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(136, 136, 136);\">（This article is reprinted by this site to provide readers with more information and news. The content does not constitute investment or consumption advice. If there are any doubts about the facts in the article, please verify with the relevant parties. The views expressed in the article are not the views of this site and are for reference only.）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>","https:\u002F\u002Fxinwei-dev-test.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs.com\u002Fintelligent\u002Faudio%3Ac5f6a4d7-d434-44ee-a0b5-2ed1d88b4c66%3A0.wav?Expires=1774838434&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tNvY2RkKjZw4LLWsrPK&Signature=td73awgq7M5UPhj1o5IV8s0CdQ8%3D","c5f6a4d7-d434-44ee-a0b5-2ed1d88b4c66",17750552]