[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fpbUlDqoTEdFVRd7H6JkY8pWxToxFawXBrvl50V3QGns":3},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},200,"操作成功",{"id":7,"title":8,"content":9,"digest":10,"source":10,"coverPath":11,"thumbsCoverPath":12,"isTop":13,"isShow":14,"baseClick":13,"clickCount":15,"createTime":16,"typeId":17,"isNewest":18,"newsInfoTypeRespVo":19,"voiceUrl":22,"voiceSize":23,"taskId":24,"releaseTime":25,"titleEn":26,"contentEn":27,"voiceUrlEn":28,"taskIdEn":29,"voiceSizeEn":30},1195,"多行业“反内卷”进行时","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">日前召开的中央财经委员会第六次会议强调，纵深推进全国统一大市场建设，要聚焦重点难点，依法依规治理企业低价无序竞争，引导企业提升产品品质，推动落后产能有序退出。在政策号召下，汽车、光伏、水泥、工程机械等行业已开始行动，通过调整产业结构、减产等方式“反内卷”。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">行业企业积极响应\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“当前，我国工业领域供需失衡压力较大，表现为产能利用率与价格体系双重承压。截至2025年4月份，PPI已连续31个月同比负增长。从产能利用率看，工业产能利用率从2021年三季度的77.7%持续回落至2025年一季度的75.1%。其中，非金属矿物制品、汽车制造业等行业产能利用率今年一季度分别降至60.9%和71.9%，设备闲置与产能沉淀问题突出。”申万宏源首席经济学家赵伟说，量价指标的持续背离表明，我国工业部门存在阶段性供需失衡问题，或需通过市场化出清、技术迭代等多维政策组合破解。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">同时，赵伟表示，近年来，地方政府招商集中在相同产业领域和“大项目”“大企业”“全产业链”上，也一定程度上助推“内卷式”竞争。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在此背景下，政策层面整治“内卷式”竞争持续加码。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\">从去年7月30日中共中央政治局会议首次提出防止“内卷式”恶性竞争，到今年《政府工作报告》首次将综合整治“内卷式”竞争纳入关键任务，再到近期新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》完善治理平台“内卷式”竞争规定，整治“内卷式”竞争已纳入法律规制范畴。\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">相关部委、行业、企业等也在积极跟进。5月19日，国家市场监管总局推出10项措施整治“内卷式”竞争。针对内卷比较严重的光伏、电池和汽车行业提出“制修订光伏、电池、新能源汽车等领域国家标准”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">日前，中国汽车工业协会发布了《关于维护公平竞争秩序，促进行业健康发展的倡议》。中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司党委书记、董事长安铁成认为，当前我国汽车产业正处于电动化、智能化、低碳化、国际化转型的关键时期，需要全行业协同推进技术创新和产业生态建设，才有望实现我国汽车产业的焕新升级和国际引领。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">在安铁成看来，“内卷式”竞争可能导致经营恶化，破坏创新投入可持续性甚至引发产品和服务质量下滑，长此以往将诱发企业经营和品牌危机。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">今年5月份，中国工程机械工业协会提到工程机械行业当前面临“内卷式”竞争问题，呼吁全行业应充分认清形势，统一认识，下定决心，采取有效行动遏制“内卷式”竞争的蔓延和加剧。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">7月1日，中国水泥协会发布《关于进一步推动水泥行业“反内卷”“稳增长”高质量发展工作的意见》，提出优化产业结构调整，进一步推动水泥行业“反内卷”“稳增长”。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">日前，国内头部光伏玻璃企业已宣布自7月份起集体减产30%，以缓解行业“内卷式”竞争。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">优化产业结构布局\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">业内专家表示，与此前淘汰水泥、平板玻璃等传统行业落后产能不同，此次“反内卷”聚焦领域从传统重工业单极转向传统与新兴行业双轨。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">领悟时代数字研究院首席研究员唐树源对记者表示，2015年提出的供给侧结构性改革主要聚焦钢铁、煤炭等传统行业的产能过剩问题，目标是通过去产能、去库存、去杠杆释放生产要素，推动低端产能出清。此次“反内卷”既涉及新能源汽车等新兴行业，也涵盖钢铁、水泥等传统行业，主要源于部分行业“价格战”和地方重复建设，导致工业品价格下行和产能过剩，目标更侧重于创新驱动和绿色转型，强调通过技术升级、行业自律和市场机制优化供给结构。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“部分行业减产能力度相对温和，注重平稳过渡，叠加降库、新旧产能更替适当增加减产量，避免对行业造成过大冲击。”隆众资讯光伏玻璃行业分析师高玲说。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">赵伟认为，此次“反内卷”将技术升级与产业转型作为核心，推动粗放式去产能向精细化治理转型。此外，从政策层面看，或更注重因地制宜与区域协同，将“破除地方保护、建设全国统一大市场”作为核心任务，强调区域协同治理，通过全国统筹规划引导地方政府摒弃重复建设与无序竞争，构建差异化、互补型产业发展格局。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">国盛证券首席经济学家熊园表示，“反内卷”并非简单去产能，而是一揽子组合拳，旨在稳增长、促转型，同时更注重建立长效机制尤其是突出法治化，比如新修订的《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》以及《公平竞争审查条例实施办法》《关于完善市场准入制度的意见》等制度文件都有明确要求。此外，“反内卷”要更注重协同效应，政府部门、行业协会、相关企业有望通力合作。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">标本兼治化解矛盾\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“内卷式”竞争成因复杂，综合整治需要遵循经济规律，汇集各方力量，多管齐下，并非一日之功。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">针对综合整治“内卷式”竞争，国家发展改革委政策研究室副主任、委新闻发言人李超在5月份新闻发布会上介绍，国家发展改革委会同有关方面，针对问题症结，因业施策、对症下药，标本兼治化解重点产业结构性矛盾，促进产业健康发展和提质升级。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“参考2015年的供给侧结构性改革经验，改革后石油石化、钢铁、煤炭、有色金属、建筑材料等相关行业平均产能利用率、PPI和ROA(资产收益率)均有明显改善。”赵伟分析说，2016年底，相关行业平均产能利用率明显低于总工业产能利用率73.8%；2017年、2018年二者产能利用率差距逐渐缩小，2019年一季度相关行业平均产能利用率达到74.5%。2017年、2018年相关行业PPI同比增速明显高于全行业PPI，也体现出“去产能”对行业价格的支撑作用。产能利用率和PPI提升推动相关行业收益率改善。2017年、2018年，相关行业ROA较2015年平均提升超1%。其中，钢铁行业ROA平均提升8.8%。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">谈及如何进一步加强行业自律、推动生态重塑，赵伟表示，政策端，要推动法规细化与监管升级，包括明确“低价倾销”等认定标准，地方政府政绩考核或可引入“产业协同度”指标，促使政府职能从“招商”转向“营商”。行业层面，可加强自律机制与产业链共治。企业端，需加强技术创新与差异化竞争，比如由龙头企业牵头建立技术联盟，推动研发投入占比提升；中小企业或可聚焦细分市场，避免同质化竞争。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">粤开证券首席经济学家、研究院院长罗志恒表示，要根据不同行业技术发展规律，分类施策进行供给侧引导，并加大对企业创新的支持力度。对于传统产业而言，提高技术标准，严控新增产能，鼓励企业进行错峰生产或自愿减产。对于新兴产业而言，技术迭代速度快，天然易产生结构性供需矛盾，不宜采取一刀切的行政干预；应提高对企业创新的支持力度，帮助企业突破技术周期，才能激发增量需求，同时支持行业进行并购重组，畅通市场化退出机制，给予更多时间和空间。\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\">【新闻来源】证券日报\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hrloo.com\u002Fnews\u002F346838.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\"> https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hrloo.com\u002Fnews\u002F346838.html\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\">（本网转发此文章，旨在为读者提供更多的信息资讯，所涉内容不构成投资、消费建议。文章事实如有疑问，请与有关方核实，文章观点非本网观点，仅供读者参考。）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","","https:\u002F\u002Fimage.51xinwei.com\u002F2025\u002F08\u002F0b3738d3f76643f7bafe2b5277a19cc3\u002F行业变革.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fimage.51xinwei.com\u002F2025\u002F08\u002Fthumbs\u002F0b3738d3f76643f7bafe2b5277a19cc3\u002F行业变革.jpg",0,1,221,"2025-08-07 17:53",2,false,{"id":17,"name":20,"enName":21},"芯位视野","Xinwei Vision","https:\u002F\u002Fxinwei-dev-test.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs.com\u002Fintelligent\u002Faudio%3Aecd2b55c-131d-4371-bad0-300f273ea308%3A0.wav?Expires=1754566646&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tNvY2RkKjZw4LLWsrPK&Signature=RmIyGZqbTxtyJtDjVjRyijrLz9E%3D",14089034,"ecd2b55c-131d-4371-bad0-300f273ea308","2025-08-07 17:42","Multiple industries are currently taking action against \"internal competition\"","\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">The recent meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission emphasized that the in-depth advancement of the construction of a national unified market should focus on key difficulties and problems, and govern enterprises' low-price disorderly competition according to law, guide enterprises to improve product quality, and promote the orderly exit of backward production capacity. Under the policy call, industries such as automobiles, photovoltaics, cement, and construction machinery have started to take actions, \"fighting internal competition\" through adjusting industrial structures and reducing production.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">Industry enterprises actively respond\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">\"Currently, China's industrial sector is under great pressure of supply-demand imbalance, which is manifested by dual pressure on capacity utilization rate and price system. As of April 2025, the PPI has been in negative growth for 31 consecutive months. Looking at the capacity utilization rate, it has continuously declined from 77.7% in the third quarter of 2021 to 75.1% in the first quarter of 2025. Among them, the capacity utilization rates of non-metallic mineral products and automobile manufacturing industries dropped to 60.9% and 71.9%, respectively, this year. The problem of equipment idling and capacity accumulation is prominent,\" said Zhao Wei, chief economist of Shenwan Hongyuan. The continued deviation of quantity and price indicators indicates that there is a stage-specific supply-demand imbalance in China's industrial sector, which may require a multi-dimensional policy combination including market clearance and technological iteration to solve.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">At the same time, Zhao Wei said that in recent years, local governments have concentrated their investment promotion in the same industry areas and \"large projects\", \"large enterprises\", and \"full industry chains\", which has also to some extent promoted \"internal competition\".\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In this context, the policy level continues to intensify the governance of \"internal competition\".\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Cstrong style=\"font-size: 18px;\">From the first proposal in the July 30, 2024 meeting of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee to prevent \"internal competition\" to the inclusion of comprehensive governance of \"internal competition\" in key tasks in this year's Government Work Report, and then to the recent revision of the \"People's Republic of China Anti-Unfair Competition Law\" to improve regulations governing platform \"internal competition\", the governance of \"internal competition\" has been incorporated into the legal regulatory framework.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Relevant departments, industries, and enterprises are also actively following up. On May 19th, the State Administration for Market Regulation introduced 10 measures to govern \"internal competition\". It proposed \"formulating and revising national standards in fields such as photovoltaic, batteries, and new energy vehicles\" for industries with severe \"internal competition\".\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Recently, the China Automobile Industry Association released \"Initiative on Maintaining Fair Competitive Order and Promoting Healthy Development of the Industry\". An Tiecheng, Party Secretary and Chairman of China Automotive Technology Center Co., Ltd., believes that the current automotive industry in China is in a critical period of transformation toward electrification, intelligence, low-carbonization, and internationalization, and requires coordinated efforts across the entire industry to promote technological innovation and industry ecosystem development to achieve the renewal and international leadership of China's automotive industry.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In An Tiecheng's view, \"internal competition\" may lead to deteriorating operations, undermine the sustainability of innovation investment, and even cause a decline in product and service quality. In the long run, this could trigger business and brand crises for enterprises.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">In May this year, the China Construction Machinery Industrial Association mentioned that the construction machinery industry is currently facing the issue of \"internal competition\", and called on the entire industry to fully recognize the situation, unify understanding, make a firm decision, and take effective actions to curb the spread and intensification of \"internal competition\".\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">On July 1st, the China Cement Association issued \"Opinions on Further Promoting High-quality Development Work of 'Anti-Internal Competition' and 'Stable Growth' in the Cement Industry\", proposing to optimize industrial structure adjustment and further promote \"anti-internal competition\" and \"stable growth\" in the cement industry.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Recently, leading domestic photovoltaic glass companies have announced that they will collectively reduce production by 30% starting from July to ease the \"internal competition\" in the industry.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">Optimizing industrial structure layout\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Industry experts say that unlike previous efforts to eliminate backward production capacity in traditional industries such as cement and flat glass, the current \"anti-internal competition\" focuses on both traditional heavy industries and emerging industries.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Tang Shuyuan, chief researcher at the Lingwu Era Digital Research Institute, told reporters that the supply-side structural reform proposed in 2015 mainly focused on the problem of overcapacity in traditional industries such as steel and coal, aiming to release production factors through de-capacity, de-stocking, and de-leveraging, and promote the elimination of low-end capacity. This \"anti-internal competition\" involves emerging industries such as new energy vehicles as well as traditional industries such as steel and cement. It mainly stems from \"price wars\" and repeated construction in local areas, causing downward pressure on industrial product prices and overcapacity. Its goal is more focused on innovation-driven development and green transition, emphasizing the optimization of the supply structure through technological upgrades, industry self-discipline, and market mechanisms.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">“Some industries' production reduction measures are relatively moderate, focusing on smooth transition, combined with inventory reduction and appropriate increase in the replacement of old and new capacities to avoid excessive impact on the industry,” said Gao Ling, analyst of photovoltaic glass industry at Longzhong Information.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Zhao Wei believes that this \"anti-internal competition\" takes technology upgrading and industrial transformation as core, promoting the shift from extensive de-capacity to refined governance. In addition, from the policy perspective, it may pay more attention to adapting to local conditions and regional coordination, taking \"eliminating local protectionism and building a national unified market\" as the core task, emphasizing regional coordinated governance, guiding local governments to abandon repeated construction and disorderly competition through national planning, and building a differentiated, complementary industrial development pattern.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Xiong Yuan, chief economist of Guosheng Securities, said that \"anti-internal competition\" is not simply about de-capacity but a series of measures aimed at stabilizing growth and promoting transformation, while placing greater emphasis on establishing a long-term mechanism, especially highlighting legalization. For example, newly revised laws such as the \"People's Republic of China Anti-Unfair Competition Law\" and the \"Implementation Measures for the Fair Competition Review Regulations\" and \"Opinions on Improving the Market Access System\" have clear requirements. In addition, \"anti-internal competition\" should pay more attention to synergistic effects, and the government, industry associations, and relevant enterprises are expected to work closely together.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\" style=\"font-size: 18px; color: rgb(255, 153, 0);\">Addressing both symptoms and root causes to resolve contradictions\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">The causes of \"internal competition\" are complex, and comprehensive management needs to follow economic laws, gather the strength of all parties, and adopt multiple approaches, which is not an overnight task.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Regarding the comprehensive governance of \"internal competition\", Li Chao, vice director of the Policy Research Office of the National Development and Reform Commission and spokesperson for the commission, introduced at a press conference in May that the National Development and Reform Commission has worked with relevant departments to target the crux of the problem, implement targeted measures, and address both symptoms and root causes to resolve structural contradictions in key industries, promoting healthy development and upgrading of the industry.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">\"Referring to the experience of the supply-side structural reform in 2015, after the reform, the average capacity utilization rate, PPI, and ROA (return on assets) of related industries such as petroleum, petrochemicals, steel, coal, non-ferrous metals, and building materials have improved significantly,\" Zhao Wei analyzed. At the end of 2016, the average capacity utilization rate of related industries was significantly lower than the overall industrial capacity utilization rate of 73.8%; the gap between the capacity utilization rates of these industries and the overall industrial capacity utilization rate gradually narrowed in 2017 and 2018, reaching 74.5% in the first quarter of 2019. In 2017 and 2018, the year-on-year growth rate of PPI in these industries was significantly higher than that of the overall industry PPI, reflecting the supporting role of \"de-capacity\" on industry prices. The improvement of capacity utilization rate and PPI has driven the improvement of industry returns. In 2017 and 2018, the ROA of these industries increased by more than 1% on average compared to 2015. Among them, the ROA of the steel industry increased by an average of 8.8%.\"\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Regarding how to further strengthen industry self-discipline and promote ecological reshaping, Zhao Wei said that at the policy level, it is necessary to push for the refinement of regulations and the upgrade of supervision, including clarifying the criteria for identifying \"dumping sales\", and introducing \"industry collaboration degree\" indicators into the performance evaluation of local governments, thus prompting the government function to shift from \"investment attraction\" to \"business environment\". At the industry level, it is possible to enhance self-discipline mechanisms and industry chain co-governance. At the enterprise level, it is necessary to strengthen technological innovation and differentiated competition, such as having leading enterprises establish technology alliances and promote the increase of R&D investment ratio; small and medium-sized enterprises may focus on niche markets to avoid homogenized competition.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"font-size: 18px;\" class=\"ql-lineHeight-1-75\">Lu Zhiheng, chief economist and president of the Research Institute of Yuekai Securities, said that different industries should be guided in terms of supply-side based on their own technological development rules, and support for enterprise innovation should be strengthened. For traditional industries, technical standards should be raised, new capacity should be strictly controlled, and enterprises should be encouraged to produce during off-peak periods or voluntarily reduce production. For emerging industries, the pace of technological iteration is fast, and structural supply-demand contradictions are natural, so it is not advisable to adopt a one-size-fits-all administrative intervention. Instead, it is necessary to strengthen support for enterprise innovation, help enterprises break through the technological cycle, thereby stimulating incremental demand, while supporting the industry in mergers and acquisitions, facilitating a market-oriented exit mechanism, and giving more time and space.\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cbr>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\">[News Source] Securities Daily\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hrloo.com\u002Fnews\u002F346838.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\" style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\"> https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hrloo.com\u002Fnews\u002F346838.html\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp class=\"ql-align-justify\">\u003Cspan style=\"color: rgb(187, 187, 187);\">（This article is reprinted by this website to provide readers with more information and news. The content involved does not constitute investment or consumption advice. If there are any questions about the facts of the article, please verify with the relevant parties. The views expressed in the article are not the views of this website and are for reference only.）\u003C\u002Fspan>\u003C\u002Fp>","https:\u002F\u002Fxinwei-dev-test.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs.com\u002Fintelligent\u002Faudio%3A8e806c66-dcff-4e0b-97eb-9839752ba699%3A0.wav?Expires=1774838501&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tNvY2RkKjZw4LLWsrPK&Signature=Inh0B7Jd8ULng0L3BfIN95QLVxU%3D","8e806c66-dcff-4e0b-97eb-9839752ba699",17204178]